GPTTicker · 988 10-K filings tracked · Oct 2026

The best AI ETF is the one you can audit.

Every AI ETF prospectus promises pure artificial intelligence exposure. The 10-Ks often say otherwise. GPTTicker counts AI mentions across 499 S&P 500 companies' SEC filings and scores each one for AI washing, so you can see which AI ETF holdings are real and which are marketing. I also run TrueAI, a screener that ranks AI ETFs by their holdings' real AI substance.

499S&P 500 companies
98810-K filings tracked
244most AI mentions, one 10-K

Search the database

Search all 988 10-K filings

The complete GPTTicker database, searchable in one place.

Popular right now

Free forever. No signup needed.

Free by email

Free AI-substance scorecard for any AI ETF

Pick any AI ETF and get a free scorecard of its top 10 holdings: AI mention counts, the two-year trend, and an AI-wash score for each name. Plus: be first in when TrueAI launches.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

•Direct answers

Quick answers

The questions AI investors actually ask. Answered straight.

01

Which AI ETF is actually the best?

The one whose holdings survive an audit. Every AI ETF claims pure artificial intelligence exposure; few publish holdings-level proof. We score AI ETFs by their holdings' real AI substance: 10-K mention counts, two-year trends, R&D. The best AI ETF is the one that still looks like AI after you read the filings.

02

What is AI washing in stocks?

Marketing dressed as strategy. AI washing is when a company talks about artificial intelligence far more than it invests in it. We flag it with a simple ratio: AI mentions in the 10-K against R&D spending. Talk without spending is the tell.

03

How do I check if a company is faking AI?

Read the 10-K, count, compare. Pull the latest 10-K from SEC EDGAR, search "artificial intelligence", note the count, then check whether R&D rose with the mentions. Or skip the manual work: GPTTicker already counted 988 filings across 499 S&P 500 companies.

04

QQQ vs AIQ vs BOTZ: which has real AI exposure?

Audit the holdings, not the name. QQQ never promised AI; AIQ and BOTZ charge for it. Compare each fund's top holdings on AI mention counts and AI-wash scores. The honest fund wins on substance per dollar of fees.

•Features

Read the filings, skip the hype

Fund names are marketing. 10-Ks are sworn statements. We built the tools around the second one.

AI-wash scores from 10-K filings

AI-wash scores from 10-K filings

Every S&P 500 company scored on AI mention counts versus R&D spending. High mentions plus rising R&D reads as real; high mentions plus flat R&D reads as AI washing. The score does the reading for you.

AI ETF holdings breakdown

AI ETF holdings breakdown

See through any AI ETF to its holdings' AI substance. Top 10 holdings scored free; full holdings rankings with TrueAI. No more paying AI prices for regular tech funds.

AI mentions earnings call tracker

Earnings call mention tracker

Quarterly AI mention counts from earnings calls, next to the 10-K numbers. Calls are theater and filings are sworn statements; we track both so you can see which companies perform AI on calls and stay quiet in filings.

AI ETF expense ratio reality check

Expense ratio reality check

Stack any AI ETF's fee against its AI-substance score. A pricey fund full of AI washers loses to a cheap index fund with real AI names. Substance per dollar, computed.

•The dataset

Inside the GPTTicker database

What we track, filing by filing. Counted from SEC documents, not marketing pages.

Table 1: GPTTicker coverage by sector, FY2026 10-K filings.
SectorCompaniesAI mentions counted
Industrials741,365
Financials712,378
Health Care561,541
Information Technology564,595
Consumer Discretionary44851
Utilities30367
Table 2: Sample records straight from the database (FY2026 10-Ks).
TickerCompanyAI mentions (10-K)AI-wash score
PANWPalo Alto Networks24448
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices20513
ADBEAdobe Inc.190100
NVDANVIDIA Corporation1815
MMM3M1611

Key terms, defined

AI-wash score
Our 0-100 heuristic for how much a company's AI talk outruns its AI investment. Higher means more hype relative to substance. A flag for further reading, not a verdict.
AI mentions (10-K)
The count of artificial intelligence references in a company's annual 10-K filing. Sworn statements, not marketing copy.
10-K
The annual report every public US company files with the SEC. Audited, lawyered, and far harder to spin than a press release.
R&D spending
Research and development expense from the income statement. When AI mentions climb but R&D does not, that gap is the story.
Earnings call
The quarterly call where management talks to analysts. Useful color, but theater next to a 10-K. We track both.

•Preview

A sneak peek inside GPTTicker

A peek under the hood. This is the data I work from.

The best AI ETF starts with the filings

How to buy AI exposure without paying for hype

Most AI ETF marketing never survives contact with the holdings. A fund can call itself artificial intelligence while its top holdings barely mention AI in their 10-Ks. The best AI ETF approach starts where the lawyers sign: SEC filings. GPTTicker counts AI mentions across 988 10-K filings from 499 S&P 500 companies, then scores each company for AI washing. An AI stock screener built on sworn statements beats one built on press releases.

Fees are the second filter. Artificial intelligence ETFs charge more than index funds, so the premium has to buy real exposure. Our AI ETF expense ratio comparison stacks each fund's fee against its holdings' AI-substance score. And when you want the short version, the TrueAI scorecard grades any AI ETF's top 10 holdings free: mention counts, two-year trend, wash score. Trust the filings, not the fund name.

•FAQ

Frequently asked questions

AI washing, AI ETFs and filing data: straight answers.

Which companies are faking AI?
Check the filing, not the press release. A company that says AI 200 times in its 10-K while R&D spending falls is marketing, not investing. GPTTicker counts AI mentions per 10-K for 499 S&P 500 companies and pairs each count with an AI-wash score, so the talkers stand out fast. Palo Alto Networks led the latest filings with 244 mentions; 3M had 16. Same market, very different stories.
What is an AI washing ETF, and how do I avoid one?
An AI washing ETF sells artificial intelligence exposure but holds companies with thin AI substance. The fix is looking through the fund at the holdings. TrueAI scores any AI ETF's top 10 holdings free, using 10-K mention counts and R&D. If half the top 10 barely mention AI in their filings, you are paying AI prices for a regular tech fund.
QQQ vs AIQ vs BOTZ: which has the most real AI exposure?
QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund wearing no AI costume, which is honest. AIQ and BOTZ charge you for AI exposure, so they should be judged on it. Run each fund's holdings through the AI-wash scores: count how many top holdings show rising AI mentions plus real R&D. The fund with more substance per dollar of expense ratio wins. Names lie; filings do not.
Is there a tool that tracks AI mentions in earnings calls?
A few. Quartr has the transcripts, and our database tracks 10-K mentions which are harder to spin than call remarks. The honest answer: earnings calls are theater, 10-Ks are sworn statements. Track both, but weight the filing.
How should I compare AI ETF expense ratios?
Divide substance by cost. A 0.68% AI ETF full of AI washers is worse than a 0.20% Nasdaq fund with real AI names inside. Stack the fee against the AI-substance score: cheap hype is still hype.

●Work with me

TrueAI Pro: know what’s really inside your AI ETF

Full AI-substance rankings of every AI ETF’s holdings, historical AI-wash scores, and spike alerts when a holding’s AI hype jumps.

$15 /mo

  • ✓Full holdings AI-substance rankings, updated quarterly
  • ✓Historical AI-wash scores for every holding
  • ✓Spike alerts when a holding’s AI hype jumps
Start screening

Tell me about your situation and I will get back to you.

Start screening